← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16493/2022dismissed

Amrita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16493 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Amrita Kumari W/o Rajesh Kumar Resident of Village- Madhopur Chhata, Ward No.- 14, P.O.- Madhopur Chhata, P.S.- Hiramma, Block- Tariyani, District- Sheohar, PIN- 843329, State- Bihar. 2.

Ambika Kumari, W/o Nirbhay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Sonbarsa, P.O.- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Tariyani, Block- Tariyani, District- Sheohar, PIN843128, State- Bihar. 3.

Kajal Kumari, W/o Arjun Kumar Resident of Village- Chhpra, Tariyani Chowk, Ward No.- 10, P.O.- Chhpra, P.S.- Tariyani Chowk, Block- Tariyani, District- Sheohar, PIN- 843316, State- Bihar. 4.

Nisha Kumari, W/o- Satish Kumar Resident of Village- Tariyani Chhapra, P.O.- Tariyani Chhapra, P.S.- Tariyani Chhapra, Block- Tariyani, DistrictSheohar, PIN- 843316, State- Bihar. 5.

Varsha Kumari, W/o- Angad Jha Resident of Village- Dostiya (Khairapahari), Ward No.- 08, P.O.- Dostiya, P.S.- Purnahiya, BlockPurnahiya, District- Sheohar, PIN- 843334, State- Bihar. 6.

Puja Kumari, W/o- Niranjan Kumar Resident of Village- Kahtarwa, Ward No.- 13, P.O.- Mathurapur Kahtarwa, P.S.- Sheohar, Block- Sheohar, District- Sheohar, PIN- 843329, State- Bihar. 7.

Pinky Kumari, W/o- Ashok Sah Resident of Village- Bedaul Baj, Ward No.- 10, P.O.- Bedaul Baj, P.S.- Purnahiya, Block- Purnahiya, District- Sheohar, PIN- 843334, State- Bihar.

8.

Puja Kumari, W/o- Rajmohan Kumar Resident of Village- Barahi Mohan, P.O.- Barahi Jagdish, P.S.- Purnahiya, Block- Purnahiya, District- Sheohar, PIN- 843334, State- Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

6.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sheohar. 7.

The District Programme Officer, ICDS, Social Welfare Department, Sheohar.

8.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Block- Tariyani, DistrictSheohar. 9.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Block- Purnahiya, DistrictSheohar. 10.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Block- Sheohar, DistrictSheohar.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16493 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/3 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nalin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Raisul Haque ( Sc 10 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of Writ in appropriate nature for quashing of Memo No. 1094 dated 15-09-2022 (Annexure 5) issued under the signature of the Respondent DPO (ICDS), Sheohar; whereby and whereunder Notice No.

1/22-23 for the selection of 09 (Nine) Anganwari Sevika and 13 (Thirteen) Anganwari Sahayika has been cancelled by the Respondent DPO (ICDS), Sheohar at the instance and direction of the Respondent DM, Sheohar, especially after the issuance of the Appointment Letters in favour of the Petitioners;

(ii) For issuance of Writ in appropriate nature for direction upon Respondent authorities to restore the earlier Notice No. 1/22-23 issued under the joint signature of the Respondent DM, DDC & DPO (ICDS) which was cancelled without any Show- Cause after the selection of the Petitioners and after the issuance of appointment letters in favour of Petitioners;

Patna High Court CWJC No.16493 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2024 3/3 (iii) For issuance of Writ in appropriate nature for direction upon Respondent authorities to accept joining of the Petitioners;"

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U