Hare Krishna Yadav@ Hare Krishna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.633 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2021 Thana- DUMRAO District- Buxar ====================================================== HARE KRISHNA YADAV@ HARE KRISHNA SINGH Son of Ganga Singh Resident of Village-Nandan, P.S.-Dumraon, District-Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 448, 452, 353, 502, 509 and 354(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases.

The informant alleges that the petitioner illegally entered into the Delivery Room of the Hospital and misbehaved with the staff on duty breaching the privacy and secrecy of the patient who were admitted in the Hospital.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR does not disclose that as to what was the reason or motive for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.633 of 2022(2) dt.04-08-2022 2/2 petitioner to enter into the hospital premises. It is next submitted that the FIR is also vague in the sense that it does not disclose that what misbehaviour the petitioner committed. It is also submitted that the petitioner objected the illegal demand/gratification which was being sought by the hospital staff from the patient, as such, the present FIR came to be instituted.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dumraon P.S. Case No. 393 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T