← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16984/2015disposed

Santosh Kumar Singh v. Chairman, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank And ORS

2015-10-16Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16984 of 2015 =========================================================== Santosh Kumar Singh, Manager/Officer Scale II, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Head Office - Mina Plaza, South of Museum, Patna-800 001, at present resident of Sharma Commercial Complex, Gur Ki Mandi, Sher Shah Road, Patna-800007. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Chairman, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Head Office :- Mina Plaza, South of Museum, Patna-800001.

2. Functional Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Head Office :- Mina Plaza, South of Museum, Patna-800001.

3. Regional Manager, Regional Office, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Ramanauj Bhawan, A P Colony, Gaya - 823001.

4. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India, Nirwachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001.

5. The Chief Electoral Officer, 7, Sardar Patel Marg (Mangles Road), Patna800015. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Kumar Ms. Priya Chaubey Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Singh For the Respondent Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank: Mr. M N Parbat, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ved Prakash Srivastva For Respondents No.4&5 : Mr. J P Karn, Sr. Advocate Mr. Siddhartha Prasad =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-10-2015 Counsel representing Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank informs the Court that transfer order of the petitioner has been ordered to be kept in abeyance. He shall only move after the polling at Patna. This information has already been given to the petitioner telephonically. Keeping the above position in mind, writ application of the petitioner has become infructuous and stands disposed of.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16984 of 2015 dt.16-10-2015 2 / 2 Petitioner shall obey the order of transfer unless otherwise modified by the bank, after 31st October, 2015. Since the transfer order has remained in abeyance, petitioner will continue to perform his responsibility in the present place of posting.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U