Lakhan Lal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4111 of 2018 ====================================================== Lakhan Lal Son of Late Basant Prasad Saha resident of Mohalla - Lalkhan Dargah Chowk, Golaghat Gadiya Sonabarsa Lane, Jagdishpur, P.S. Tatarpur, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

Commissioner, Bhagalpur Commissionary, Bhagalpur. 3.

District Magistrate cum Collector, Bhagalpur. 4.

Addl. Collector, Bhagalpur.

5.

Senior Deputy Collector, District Revenue Branch, Bhagalpur. 6.

Land Reforms Deputy Collector L.R.D.C., Bhagalpur. 7.

Circle Officer, Office of Circle Officer, Nathnagar, Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy -Gp18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2020 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls though link of video conferencing has already been sent to him. Learned A.C. to G.P. 18, Abhoy Kr. Kashyap is present through video conferencing.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for revoking his suspension order dated 17.01.2017 issued vide Memo No. 114 and also sought issuance of direction to respondents for payment of dues amount of suspension period including the subsistence allowance and salary after quashing of suspension order. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 3 to 7 has been filed and it has, specifically, been pleaded at para 9

Patna High Court CWJC No.4111 of 2018(4) dt.29-06-2020 2/2 of the counter affidavit that the suspension of petitioner has already been revoked and direction for payment of dues and other retiral benefits have already been ordered. It appears the the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed and that is the reason the petitioner does not have any interest to pursue this matter, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of learned A.C. to G.P. 18, this petition stands dismissed being infructuous.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) GAURAV S./- U T