Suresh Prasad Gupta @ Suresh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary Patna Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1658 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2012 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Suresh Prasad Gupta @ Suresh Prasad Son Of Late Ramasharay Prasad R/O Ward No. 14 Main Road Sonar Patti, Ps- Bairagania, Distt- Sitamarhi, Bihar 843313 2.

Sushil Kumar Son Of Suresh Prasad Gupta @ Suresh Prasad R/O Near Dhandhariya School Main Road -12, Ps- Bairagania, Distt Sitamarhi, Bihar 843313 3.

Shailendra Kumar Son Of Suresh Prasad Gupta @ Suresh Prasad R/O Ward No. 14 Main Road Sonar Patti, Ps- Bairagania, Distt- Sitamarhi, Bihar 843313 ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary Patna Bihar Bihar 2.

The Department Of Home Bihar State Through Its Principal Secretary Patna Bihar Bihar 3.

The District Magistrate Cum Collector Sitamarhi Bihar 4.

The Superintendent Of Police Sitamarhi Bihar 5.

Jayant Kumar Son Of Vijay Prasad.

6.

Vijay Prasad Son Of Ramasharay Prasad 7.

Kishore Kumar Son Of Vijay Prasad.

8.

Gaurav Vishal @ Tinkoo Kumar Son Of Vijay Prasad. Private respondents no. 5 to 8 are resident of Main Road Sonar Patti, PS- Bairagania, Distt- Sitamarhi, Bihar 843313 ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bindeshwar Sah, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. M. Nasrul Huda Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-04-2025 This application has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. vide Bairagania P.S. Case No.47 of 2012 registered for the offence under sections 448 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code. 2.

Learned counsel for the State has submitted

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1658 of 2023(2) dt.10-04-2025 2/2 that in the present case the investigation has been concluded, charge-sheet has been submitted and the case has been committed to the Court of Sessions.

3.

In view of the aforesaid facts, this application has now become infructuous. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T