Narsingh Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19846 of 2015 ====================================================== Narsingh Singh Son of Late Kasi Singh, Resident of Village & P.O. Dharout, P.S. Mukhdumpur, District - Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Primary Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Director, Directorate General, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Collector, Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad.

5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad.

6. The District Superintendent of Education (D.S.E. for short) Jehanabad Designated as the District Programme Officer (Establishment), District - Jehanabad.

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), District - Arwal.

8. The Head Master-cum-Drawing & Disbursing Officer, Primary School, Dhorha Arwal, P.O. & P.S. - Rampur Chauram, District - Arwal.

9. The Treasury Officer, Arwal.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.C. to S.C. 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

"That this writ petition is direction for statutory interest from July 1997 to August 2004 and further till the date of actual payment and interest calculated on the basis of Treasury Voucher number (T.V. No.) and encashment as contained in Annexure-04 to this writ petition and /or pass such other order or orders under the facts and circumstances of this case."

Patna High Court CWJC No.19846 of 2015 (7) dt.26-06-2018 2/2

3. It is common ground at the Bar that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U