Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2504/2022bail granted

Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2504 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Siwan ====================================================== PAPPU YADAV S/O JAYRAM CHAUDHARY, R/o village- Tilmapur, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-06-2022 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with CIII Case No. 269 of 2020 lodged under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. As per the F.I.R., total recovery of 341.200 liters country made liquor.

It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that charge sheet has already been filed and petitioner is in judicial custody since 24.03.2021. He also submits that there is only one case is pending in which he was granted bail at the level of trial court itself.

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2504 of 2022(2) dt.08-06-2022 2/2 Considering the facts of the case and after perusal of the records as well as this aspect that charge sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2021, let the petitioner above named be granted bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Siwan in connection with CIII Case No. 269 of 2020. But the incident of the petitioner is not clean. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall not involved in such type of crime in further and for that the petitioner is also directed to file an undertaking that he shall not involve in such types of activity in future before trial court at the time of furnishing his bail-bond.

The prosecution is at liberty to file cancellation of bail, in case the petitioner violates his undertaking. (Dr. Anshuman, J) ravishankar/- U T