Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61900/2022bail granted

Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-03Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61900 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2014 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== ANIL YADAV Son of Bhola Yadav R/v- Semri, P.S.- Chenari, DistrictRohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 03-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no any prior complaint regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased against the petitioner and others. There is no consistent evidence against the petitioner, only suspicion has been raised against him. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61900 of 2022(8) dt.03-08-2023 2/2 marriage of the deceased with the petitioner was solemnized in the year 2011 and the case has been registered in the year 2014. He submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 16.07.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner is the husband of the deceased and he has full responsibility to take care of his wife (deceased).

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 132 of 2014.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T