← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/2069/2015withdrawn

Dewanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-11-10Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2069 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14158 of 2015 ====================================================== Dewanti Devi .... .... Appellant

Versus

The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar -Manglam, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Krishna Kumar, AC to GP-26 For the Respondent No. 8 :

Mr. Ramakanat Sharma, Senior Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 10-11-2015 We have heard Mr. S. B. K. Mangalam, learned Counsel, appearing for the appellant, and Mr. Krishna Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.26, appearing for the respondent-State. We have also heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the respondent No.8.

After some arguments, Mr. S. B. K. Mangalam, learned Counsel, appearing for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to challenge, in accordance with law, the notice, dated 04.11.2015 (Annexure-1 to I. A. No. 9118 of 2015), which has been issued by the respondent No. 6, Block Development Officer-cum- Executive Officer, Block Panchayat

Patna High Court LPA No.2069 of 2015 (2) dt.10-11-2015 2/2 Samiti, Bihta, whereby a special meting to discuss the motion of no confidence against the appellant, Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Bihta, has been convened on 14.11.2015 at 12 Noon. No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the appellant to challenge, in accordance with law, the notice, dated 04.11.2015 (Annexure-1 to I. A. No. 9118 of 2015), which has been issued by the respondent No. 6, Block Development Officer-cum- Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Bihta, whereby a special meting to discuss the motion of no confidence against the appellant, Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Bihta, has been convened on 14.11.2015 at 12 Noon. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present appeal. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U