← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18489/2015withdrawn

Lalita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18489 of 2015 ====================================================== Lalita Kumari, W/o Arun Kumar Yadav, resident of village- Dharhara, P.OMahadeomath, P.S- Andharamath, Distt.- Madhubani (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director Education, Government of Bihar, Secretariat Building, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

3. The District Education Officer, Madhubani

4. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Madhubani, Laukhi.

5. The District Programming Officer, Asthapana (Establishment) Collectorate, Madhubani.

6. The Block Education Officer, Laukhi, Madhubani.

7. The Panchayat Sachiv (Secretary), Gram Panchayat Rajya, Village- Narahia, South Block, Laukhi, Distt.- Madhubani.

8. The Headmaster, Teacher, Rajkiya Primary Education School, Sananpatti, P.S.- Narahia, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Raisul Haque- Sc4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and, as such, the present writ application has become infructuous.

In view of the above, the writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U