Parvez Alam v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54283 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -173 Year- 2016 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Parvez Alam, son of late Sk. Yasin resident of Village- Dakhani Bucha, P.S- Sugauli,District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Akhatari Begam Daughter of Anwarul Haque Vill- Dakhani Bucha, P.S.- Sugauli, Distt- East Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jha, Advocate For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Vijay Shankar Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Trial No. 2013 of 2016, arising out of Complaint Case No. 173 of 2016 lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. At the very outset it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep his wife (opposite party No.2) with full dignity. Learned counsel for opposite party No.2 has no objection to the prayer made stating that she is willing to live with the petitioner.

In view of the above, let petitioner surrender in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54283 of 2016 (3) dt.28-03-2017 2/2 court below on 10.4.2017 and file a petition to that effect and on that date opposite party No.2 will also appear in the court below and after hearing both the parties the court below will allow them to live together and also release the petitioner on provisional bail to his own satisfaction and the court below will watch the conduct of both the parties for a period of six months by calling them on each month on the date fixed and on being satisfied after six months the court below will confirm the bail bond of the petitioner and if not satisfied with the conduct of any of the parties court below will pass any appropriate order.

With the above observations, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U