Patna High CourtCWJC/4638/2016disposed

Ilyas Alam @ Md. Ilyas v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-08Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4638 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Ilyas Alam @ Md. Ilyas S/o lat eBasiruddin R/o Arrabari , PS Paharkatta District Kishanganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary,Food & Consumer Protection Department , Bihar Patna.

2. The Collector, Kishanganj.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kishanganj.

4. The Block Supply Officer, Potihia Kishanganj. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Ac to GP.15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, petitioner is challenging the order dated 11.5.2015 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Kishanganj by which he has cancelled his licence for running a P.D.S shop.

Earlier against the order of cancellation the petitioner has moved before this Court vide C.W.J.C. No.617 of 2015 but the case was remanded back to re-consider the matter after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Accordingly the petitioner was given chance to file show cause and after completion of the same the order

Patna High Court CWJC No.4638 of 2016 (2) dt.08-08-2017 has been passed.

The petitioner, if so advised, may file appeal before the appellate authority within three weeks from today. If the petitioner files appeal within the aforesaid period, the Collector, Kishanganj will dispose of the same within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal. While disposing of the limitation matter the Collector will take into account the pendency of the present case before this Court. This Court is not giving any opinion on the merit of the case.

With the aforesaid observations and directions this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U