← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61433/2025bail granted

Shankar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61433 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- FESHAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Shankar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar S/O Balrup Yadav @ Balrup Singh R/O Village- Husenabad, P.S.- Fesar, Distt.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukul Kumari, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Fesar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025, dated 23.06.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. As per allegation, 05 litres of illicit liquor has been recovered from the canal side.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that recovery of contraband has been made from an open space accessible to public at large and nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. He also submits that no prima facie case is made out against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61433 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 petitioner and hence, the present petition is maintainable and the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has been made accused in three cases in which he is on bail.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in connection with Fesar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61433 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T