Taskeen Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7111 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Taskeen Ahmad son of Zeyaur Rahman resident of village and P.O. - Dumariya, P.S. Raniganj, District - Araria Secretary of Managing Committee of Madarsa Faizul Minnat Dumariya District Araria .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board through its Secretary, 5 Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

3. The Chairman, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, 5, Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board through its Secretary, 5 Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

5. The District Education Officer, Araria.

6. Md. Ali Akbar son of late Abdul Hasan resident of village/P.O. Dumariya, P.S. Raniganj, District - Araria.

7. Moulvi Jameel Ahmad son of late Serajuddin Incharge Head Moulvi of Madarsa Faizul Minnat at P.O. - Dumariya, District - Araria. .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Obaidur Rahman, Adv. For the State : Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav, GP XXIII with Meera Singh, AC to GP XXIII For the Board : Mr. Md. Rashid Alam, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board whereby the petitioner's application for enquiry in relation to constitution of new Managing Committee has been rejected and the amount deposited by the petitioner of Rs.4,500/- for the said enquiry has been returned. There is provision for appeal under Section 28 of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board Act, 1981. The petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.7111 of 2017 (3) dt.25-01-2018 2/2 can avail the said remedy against the impugned decision of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board.

It is made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the petitioner's claim.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of with the liberty as aforesaid.

The petitioner shall be at liberty to raise any other point which, according to him, is available which have either been raised in the present writ application or have not been raised in the present writ application, in his appeal before the appellate authority. It is also orchard that if any question of limitation arises about the time during which the matter remained pending before this Court shall be excluded.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) SA/- U