Laila Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22893 of 2017 (2) dt.28-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22893 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2016 Thana -TARAIYA District- SARAN ====================================================== Laila Khatoon Wife of Chand Mohammad Resident of Village- Pokhrera, P.S. Taraiyan, District Saran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 15.07.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21737 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 29.02.2016 having no criminal antecedent, there is no specific allegation against her, allegations are omnibus and general in nature and as such she deserves sympathetic consideration and further trial has not been concluded as up-till no prosecution witness has been examined. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that there is no progress in the trial and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and the petitioner is a lady, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22893 of 2017 (2) dt.28-06-2017 execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge Xth, Saran at Chapra in S. Tr. No. 470 of 2016 arising out of Taraiyan P.S. Case No. 44 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on her part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T