Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51255 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- PATNA ====================================================== Ajeet Kumar S/o Shyam Chandra Bind .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar, Advocte For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gandhi Maidan Mahila P.S. Case No. 38 of 2016 registered under Sections 307,498(A), 504,506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. No specific allegation has been leveled against him. The fact is that the informant was not satisfied with the status of her husband. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named accused and there is direct allegation against him.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the State, I do not feel inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51255 of 2016 (5) dt.09-03-2017 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail is, therefore, rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) Prakash/- U T