Shailesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7773 of 2017 =========================================================== Shailesh Kumar Son of Late Indrasan Singh, Resident of Village-Narayanpur, P.O. Madhopur, P.S. Bihta, District-patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Department of Building Construction, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Building Construction, Bihar, Patna,
3. The Chief Engineer, Building Construction Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Executive Engineer, Gardanibagh Building Division, Department of Building Construction, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunath Singh, Adv. Mr. Jai Shankar Patha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Ms. Ratna Kumari, AC to PAAG-2 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is claiming that the admitted amount of Rs. 3,09,266/- be released in his favour as he has executed the work in terms of the Agreement No. 6H2 15-16. The tender was floated, the petitioner filed the tender in sealed cover, the work valuing Rs. 3,09,266/- was allotted to him which he has completed in terms of the agreement. The petitioner has submitted the bill but, the payment was not made to the petitioner which compelled him to approach before the Chief Engineer, Building
Patna High Court CWJC No.7773 of 2017 dt.25-07-2017 Construction Department, Patna who gave direction for payment of the admitted bill to the petitioner but, the petitioner is moving from pillar to post till today with empty hand.
In that view of the matter, let the petitioner should file a detailed representation to the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Building Construction, Bihar, Patna who will be obliged to consider the grievance of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner has carried out the work successfully in terms of the agreement, in such circumstances, the admitted amount should be paid to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the representation by the petitioner.
With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 31.07.2017 Transmission Date NA