Aanand Kumar @ Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62272 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2022 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Aanand Kumar @ Anand Kumar S/O Gowardhan Paswan Resident Of Village- Bakri Delhi Vijay Bigha, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya. 2.

Tipu Kumar @ Sikandra Kumar @ Tipu Das S/O Kaliya Das Resident Of Village- Bakri Delhi Vijay Bigha, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheikh Arkan Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-02-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 has been arrested by the police, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this application with regard to petitioner no. 1.

Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this application with regard to petitioner no. 1 is dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 342, 323, 326, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is said to have assaulted the nephew of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62272 of 2022(2) dt.23-02-2023 2/2 informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the injury of Arun Kumar and Bharath Kumar are in nature of simple and injury no. 5 of Ramchandra Kumar is grievous and other injuries are simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 159 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T