← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1541/2017disposed

Thagan Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1541 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2015 Thana -SC/ST DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Thagan Sahani Son of Late Gena Sahani, Resident of Village- Isamaila, P.S.- Rajepur, District- East Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Appellant

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1, Special P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special P.P.

This appeal has been filed for setting aside the order the order dated 24.9.2016 passed in A.B.P. No. 1970 of 2016 by Additional Sessions Judge-I, East Champaran, Motihari, arising out of SC/ST Motihari (Rajeppur) P.S.Case No. 84 of 2015 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 427, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(i)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and for grant of pre-arrest bail to the appellant.

Allegation against the appellant is that he along with other accused persons went to the house of the informant and uprooted cauliflower crops and abused the informant by taking his

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1541 of 2017 (2) dt.03-07-2017 2/2 caste name.

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that the land in dispute belongs to the appellant, which has already been decided by a court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Chakiya and being aggrieved by the same the false and concocted case has been filed against the appellant.

Learned Special P.P. has opposed the prayer stating that mere perusal of FIR it appears that prima facie case under Section 3(i)(x) of the Act is made out against the appellant, as such, this appeal for pre-arrest bail is not maintainable. Having heard both sides and considering the facts and circumstances, this appeal is not maintainable. Let appellant surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the Special court below on the basis of the submission made above as well as on the basis of allegation and pass appropriate order, if possible, on the same day. This appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U