← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69311/2023allowed

Ravi Bhushan Kumar @ Ravi Kumar @ Chhotan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69311 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2023 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Ravi Bhushan Kumar @ Ravi Kumar @ Chhotan Kumar S/O Ram Ekbal Singh @ Ram Kewal Singh R/O Village- Kuari Madan, P.S- Majorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

2.

Rohit Kumar @ Gulshan Singh S/O Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Singh @ Ram Vinay Singh R/O Village- Kuari Madan, P.S- Majorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 84 of 2023 registered under sections 302, 201, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the FIR, allegation against co-accused, namely, Kanhai Singh is that he fired from his pistol to one Anmol Raj due to which he sustained gun shot injury and later on he died during the course of treatment. Allegation against these petitioners is that they also involved in this offence. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner are innocent and have committed no offence. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69311 of 2023(2) dt.02-11-2023 2/2 have falsely been implicated in this case. No any specific overt act of firing against these petitioners rather the specific allegation of firing upon the deceased is against co-accused, namely, Kanhai Singh. Nothing consistent material has come against these petitioners. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial custody since 15.07.2023.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the custody of the petitioners, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 84 of 2023 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Sitamarhi.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shubham/- U T