Patna High CourtCWJC/3716/2018disposal with observation

Kundan Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-31Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.3716 of 2018 dt.31-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3716 of 2018 ===========================================================

1. Kundan Kumar Singh Son of Narendra Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla - Shivpuri, Durgabari, P.S. - K. Hat, District - Purnea.

2. Dilkeshwar Singh @ Dilkeshwar Kumar Singh Son of Ashok Singh Resident of Mohalla - Police Line, P.S. - K. Hat, District - Purnia.

3. Brajesh Kumar Singh Son of Banaras Singh Resident of Mohalla - Kosi Colony, P.S. - K.Hat, District - Purnia.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Purnia.

5. The Mayor, Nagar Nigam, Purnia.

6. The Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Purnia.

7. The Executive Officer, Nagar Nigam, Purnia. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shamsad Alam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abbas Haider -SC6 For the Nagar Nigam : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 3933 of 2017 (Amit Kumar Rastogi & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.

In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is

Patna High Court CWJC No.3716 of 2018 dt.31-10-2018 directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of petitioners and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioners.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date1.11.2018 Transmission Date NA