Balram @ Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65459 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2025 Thana- PALI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Balram @ Ajay Kumar, S/O Shiv Prasad Kuthar, R/O Vill.- Koriya, P.S.- Sajeti, Dist.- Kanpur, State- Uttar Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shalini, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Md. Khalid Quraishi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 207 of 2025 arising out of Pali P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 96 of the BNS.

3. As per prosecution case, allegation against the petitioner is that he abducted the minor daughter of the informant when the victim girl went to school.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on suspicion. The petitioner runs a Circus in Kanpur. The victim girl saw his video on YouTube and contacted him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65459 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/2 Thereafter, she herself reached there for the purpose of working in his Circus. The petitioner did not enticed the minor daughter of the informant. In her statement, she had not made any allegation against the petitioner. The medical examination of the victim girl was denied by the victim and the informant. Petitioner has clean antecedent. Charge-sheet has already submitted and there is no likelihood of absconding him or tampering with the evidence. Petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2025. He undertakes to cooperate in the trial of the present case.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional and Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad, in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T