Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15547 of 2016 ====================================================== Nagrik Adhikar Manch through its Trustee namely Ranjeet Pandit, son of Parshuram Pandit, resident of village- Gajipur, P.S.- Desari, DistrictVaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary to the Government, Cabinet Secretariat Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Prashant Kishore, son of Srikant Pandey, resident of Plot No. 3234 ATS Advantage Ahinsa Khand, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad through Principal Secretary to the Government Cabinet Secretariat Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8182 of 2017 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal, Son of Late Jai Narain Jaiswal, resident of Jagannathpuri Barmasiya, P.O. & P.s., District-Katihar (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna-800015
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna800015
3. The Principal Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat Department, Govt. of BIhar, Old Secretariat, Patna-800015
4. Shri Prashant Kishore, Son of Dr. Shrikant Pandey, the Advisor to the Hon'ble Chief Minister, Policy and Programme Implementation, Department of Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of Bihar, patna-800015 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 11-08-2017 Keeping the legal question involved in the matter
Patna High Court CWJC No.15547 of 2016 (9) dt.11-08-2017 2/2 open for consideration, if required, on a future date in an appropriate case, now, as the appointment of Respondent No. 4 has come to an end, these petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P.
U