← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61960/2025bail granted

Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-09Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61960 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2024 Thana- GWALPARA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Raushan Kumar son of Umesh Yadav Resident Of Village- Bharrahi Ward No 03 PS -Bharrahi District -Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pooja Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 182 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that three accused persons including the petitioner looted away the motorcycle of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of the fact that the informant identified the petitioner in the photograph produced by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61960 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/2 police. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted motorcycle. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2025 and has two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 182 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T