Mahesh Sahni @ Maheshwar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61970 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- BISHANPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Mahesh Sahni @ Maheshwar Sahni S/o Late Kari Sahni Resident of Village - Phulwaria, P.S.- Bishanpur, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurav Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswalm, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 74, 351(2) 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons including the petitioner assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61970 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/2 specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the wife and son of the informant. Learned counsel further submitted that the specific allegation of assaulting the informant by means of axe is against co-accused Rakesh Sahani. There is case and counter-case between the parties. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T