Shankar Mali v. The Authorized Officer Uco Bank, Zonal Office

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4679 of 2015 ====================================================== Shankar Mali, Son of Late Jagan Mali, resident of Chand Chaura, near Bikaneri Dharamsala, P.S. Civil Lines, District- Gaya, .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The Authorized officer Uco Bank, Zonal office, Maurya Lok Complex, 4th Floor Block A, Dak Bunglow Road, Patna-1, .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Ms. Renu Jha, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Shambhu Nath Choubey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 07-04-2015 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-U.Co. Bank.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the direction contained in the order dated 27.03.2015, the petitioner has paid Rs. 1,50,000/- on 27.03.2015 and again two lacs rupees on 30th of March, 2015. It is contended that though the petitioner was required only to pay rupees two lacs only, he has paid Rs. 3,50,000/-.

In above view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the concerned Branch of the respondent-Bank within a week. Thereafter, the competent Officer of the Bank will provide the entire calculation chart after adjusting the amount paid by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.4679 of 2015 dt.07-04-2015 petitioner during the pendency of this writ application and earlier also. Such amount would be required to be paid by the petitioner in instalment within a period of six months. The concerned Officer of the respondent-Bank will also fix equal instalment for payment of the balance amount including the interest which would accrue on the residual amount. The petitioner would be required to pay each and every instalment fixed by the respondent-Bank. If he fails to pay anyone of the instalments, the respondent-Bank would be at liberty to proceed for recovery of the debt from the petitioner in accordance with law. It is made clear that in view of the aforesaid arrangement, the ancillary cost, such as, expenses towards legal expenses etc., would not be not added in the residual amount. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U