Vipin Singh @ Bipin Bihari @ Vipin Bihari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61777 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-652 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Vipin Singh @ Bipin Bihari @ Vipin Bihari S/O Dinanath Singh Resident of Gajachak, Mahumdpur, Shorampuri, Koriawan, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Madhumay Madhup, Advocate Mr. Nilabh Ranjan, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 24.04.2025 at about 7 PM, while informant was returning home, in the meantime, three F.I.R. named accused persons along with two unidentified persons, intercepted the informant, abused and assaulted him. One of the accused person took out pistol and fired a shot which narrowly missed the informant. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61777 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/3 alleged that while the informant was fleeing away, accused persons fired three more shots at him but he managed to run and escape.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation. Though there is allegation of firing but no one has sustained any fire arm injury.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Patna in connection with Phulwari (Janipur) P.S. Case No. 652 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61777 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T