← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17437/2022dismissed

Manju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-09Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17437 of 2022 ====================================================== Manju Devi Wife of Rajesh Ram, Resident of village- Parsa Khojwa Tola, Police Station- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Patna. Bihar.

3.

The Deputy Director, Welfare, Tirhut Division Muzaffarpur. 4.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran. 6.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Majhaulia, District- West Champaran.

7.

Mamta Kumari Wife of Manager Ram, Resident of Village- Parsa Khojwa Tola, Police Station- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (GP-2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1.(i) To set aside the order dated 03.06.2022 contained in Memo No.336 passed by Respondent No.6 in Complaint Case No.04 of 2021 by which the petitioner was terminated from the post of Anganwari Sevika Posted at the Anganwari Center No.318, in ward No.13, under Parsa Gram Panchyat, Block Majhauliya, District- West Champaran.

(ii) To direct the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioner as Anganwari Sevika in the Center

Patna High Court CWJC No.17437 of 2022(2) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 No.318 Ward No.13, Parsa Gram Panchyat, Block Majhauliya, District- West Champaran."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U