← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59434/2019bail granted

Jito Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-27Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59434 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2018 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== JITO YADAV @ JITENDRA YADAV Son of Ramanuj Yadav Resident of Village - Narepur Diyara, P.S.- Bachchwara, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sabal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Submission is that there is case and counter case and F.I.R. was lodged after two months of the date of occurrence i.e. on 02.01.2018 after due deliberations and concoction.

Allegation against the petitioner is that firing of the petitioner hit at the right chest of the informant. Petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2019. Investigation of the case is already complete. There is no explanation for delayed information to the Police.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59434 of 2019(2) dt.27-09-2019 2/2 Considering the entire facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Bachchwara Police Station Case No.45 of 2018, subject to condition that both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) abhishek/- U T