Uday Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4941 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Uday Kumar Ram Son of Prabhu Das Resident of Village- Bora Kothi , PS Chausa, district Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Director , Bihar Education Project Counsel Education Bhawan , Saidpur, Rajendra Nagar, Patna.

3. Regional Deputy Director, Patna Commissionary, Patna.

4. District Programme Officer, Primary Education Cum Mars Education Patna.

5. District Education Officer, Patna.

6. Block Education Officer, Pandarak Dist Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma For the State : Mr. Ajit Pratap Singh, SC-15 Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv. AC to SC-22 For respondent BEPC - Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 23-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.

In view of the fact that substantive payments have been received by the petitioner, the present writ application has lost its significance. In case the petitioner finds that wrong calculation has been made or payments of retiral dues is due, he shall be at liberty to file representation before the competent authority which shall be considered by the authority and if the grievance of the petitioner finds genuine, necessary orders be passed by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.4941 of 2016 (3) dt.23-04-2018 concerned respondents within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation by the petitioner. In view of the above, this writ application is disposed off.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) A.K.V./- U