Raushan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27152 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -263 Year- 2012 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Raushan Kumar Yadav, Son of Kaushal Yadagv, Resident of VillageJagdishpur, P.S.- Balia, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hare Krishna Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 263 of 2012, disclosing offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, who has been granted regular bail.

Considering the seriousness of the offence, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner, above named, the privilege of anticipatory bail.

This application is, accordingly, rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27152 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017 2/2 The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned court below within a period of two weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered by the learned court below on its own merit, without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U T