Rohit Dom v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66462 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2024 Thana- ARWAL District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Rohit Dom Son of Birendra Dom Village- Baidarabad, Police StationArwal, District- Arwal 2.

Birendra Dom Son of Late Keshav Dom Village- Baidarabad, Police StationArwal, District- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Krishna Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant for the reason that daughter of the informant was in love with Kush, son of petitioner No. 2 and brother of petitioner No. 1, and they eloped and subsequently performed their marriage.

4.

It is next submitted that though in the FIR, it is alleged that the victim is a minor aged about 14 years but the said

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66462 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/2 allegation has been levelled only to give serious color to the case, when victim is a major. It is further submitted that it has been specifically pleaded at para-13 that the victim has filed an application before the S.D.P.O, Arwal and the S.H.O Arwal police station, bringing to their notice that she has married Kush and apprehends that her husband may be killed.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and that petitioners are brother and father of Kush, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 86 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T