← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6099/2022bail granted

Ajay Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-13Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6099 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2021 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

AJAY RAM Son of Chuman Ram Resident of Village-Gointhahan, P.O. and P.S.-Harsidhi, District-East Champaran.

2.

Chuman Ram Son of Bigan Ram Resident of Village-Gointhahan, P.O. and P.S.-Harsidhi, District-East Champaran.

3.

Lal Muni Devi Wife of Chuman Ram Resident of Village-Gointhahan, P.O. and P.S.-Harsidhi, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 13-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 299 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 307, 354 and other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the informant with lathi and petitioner no.1 gave Dab blow on her head.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6099 of 2022(2) dt.13-06-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that no case of attempt of murder is made out from the fact of the case as there is no repetition of blow and injuries have been found to be simple in nature caused by hard and sharp weapon and allegation of such injury are against petitioner no.1 whereas no specific allegation has been made out against petitioner nos. 2 and 3. Petitioners are in custody since 04.08.2021. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the submission made hereinabove and considering the nature of injury along with period of custody, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, East Champaran, Motihari/court concerned in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 299 of 2021, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, preferably one of the parents.

(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence for three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6099 of 2022(2) dt.13-06-2022 3/3 petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) s.hassan/- U T