Narendra Kumar v. Deepak Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2675 of 2023 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1269 of 2018 ====================================================== Narendra Kumar S/o Late Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh R/o A P Colony, Near Hotel Ashoka, Po and PS-Rampur, District-Gaya at Present Village and P.O.-Akauna, P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangbad, Presently Posted as Secretary, Ab-hoc Committee, Thakur B D Sinha Janta College, Akauna, P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Deepak Kumar S/o Bhola Nath Singh Resident of Vill P.O.- Akauna, P.S.- Goh, Dist.- Aurangabad, State Bihar.
2.
Magadh University, Bodhgaya, through its Registrar Bodh Gaya, Bihar. 3.
Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya Bihar. 4.
Sri Awadhesh Narayan Singh Male, Hon'ble Principal Member of Legislative Council Bihar and Member of Thakur B.D. Sinha Janta College, Village-akauna, P.O.-Akauna, P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangabad, Bihar. 5.
Principal of Thakur B.D. Sinha Janta College, Village-Akauna, P.O.-Akauna, P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangabad, Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Siddharth Harsh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Rushali, Adv.
Mr. Prabhojot Singh, Adv.
For the Magadh University :
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 17-04-2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner, realizing the fact that the petitioner was neither party in the original writ petition bearing CWJC No. 12667 of 2018 nor in the appeal bearing LPA No. 1269 of 2018, seeks not to press the present petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to file
Patna High Court MJC No.2675 of 2023(5) dt.17-04-2025 2/2 an appeal against the order dated 27.8.2018, passed in CWJC No. 12667 of 2018.
2.
We find that if the petitioner is having legal right to file an appeal under the law, nothing prevents him from doing so. 3.
Accordingly, the present restoration petition stands disposed off as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ( Shailendra Singh, J) Ajay/- U