Hridya Narayan Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2059 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Hridya Narayan Mahto S/o Raj Nandan Mahto, Resident of Village + PostMadhubani Ghat, P.S.- Motihari Mofasil, West Champaran, present working as Pump Operator at Motihari Branch, Motihari. 2.

Sunil Kumar S/o Pargan Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village and PostBankatwa, P.S.- Jilna, District- West Champaran (Bihar) and Presently Working as Pump Operator, Motihari, West Champaran. 3.

Arman Kumar S/o Surendra Mishra, Resident of Vilage- Dhakahan Mishra Tola, Post- Dhakahan Bazar, P.S. Motihari, District- Motihari Presently working as Pump Operator at Motihari Branch, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Special Secretary-cum-Engineer-in-Chief, Government of Bihar, Public Health Engineering Department, State Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Engineer-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Nirman Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

3.

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, West Champaran, Bettiah (Mechanical).

4.

The Executive Engineer, Mechanical, Public Health Engineering Department, Division- Bettiah, West Champaran. 5.

The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Ram Nagar, West Champaran, Bettiah.

6.

The Executive Engineer Mechanical, Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur.

7.

The Executive Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health Engineers Department, Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-4 Mr. U.P. Singh, AC to SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-11-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned counsel for the State is present.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2059 of 2018(6) dt.22-11-2023 2/2

2. It transpires to this Court vide order dated 30.10.2023 that on the said date also no one had appeared upon repeated calls on behalf of the petitioners and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned. Today also no one appears.

3. Learned counsel for the State submits that all petitioners are daily wager since 01.01.2009 and as per Circular No.639 dated 16.03.2006, those working prior to cut off date fixed, i.e., 11.12.1990, are entitled for regularization and, as such, there is no case of the petitioners.

4. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T