Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31819/2017bail granted

Sonu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31819 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- PATNA ====================================================== Sonu Chaudhary Son of Late Lakhan Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla - Saketpuri, Road No.2, P.S.- Patrakar Nagar, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Srivastava, Advocate For the State : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2017 in connection with Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner as also Deepak Kumar have been falsely implicated merely on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Rishi Kumar, who has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 29441 of 2017 and so also another accused Deepak Kumar has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 26602 of 2017. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31819 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T