← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8369/2018dismiss for nonprosecution

Parmanand Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-09-23Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8369 of 2018 ====================================================== Parmanand Jha Son of Late Vakil Jha, Resident of Village- Dharkjari, P.S.- Mansoorchak, District- Bhagalpur. At present posted as Sub-Inspector of Police at Sabaur Police Station under Bhagalpur, District. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Patna.

3.

The Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur. 4.

The Dy. Inspector General Of Police, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur. 5.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur. 6.

The Dy. Superintendent of Police Headquarter, First- cum-Conducting Officer, Bhagalpur.

7.

The Additional Superintendent of Police, Town, Bhagalpur. 8.

The In-charge Hindi Section, Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad- SC8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 23-09-2024 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner however, Learned Counsel for State is present.

2. Vide order dated 29.07.2024, it transpires to this Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that

Patna High Court CWJC No.8369 of 2018(5) dt.23-09-2024 2/2 the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ application and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application.

4. In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U