Patna High CourtCWJC/7656/2018disposal with observation

Md. Naushad Khan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-31Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7656 of 2018 ===========================================================

1. Md. Naushad Khan, Son of Md. Rohit Khan, Resident of Village- Ratni, Police Station- Govindpur, District- Nawada.

2. Ajit Kumar Pandey, Son of Shri Ramanand Pandey, Resident of VillageSamay, Police Station- Nawada, District- Nawada.

3. Naresh Singh, Son of Shri Alakhdeo Singh, Resident of Village- Chhothia, Police Station- Hilsa, District- Nawada.

4. Neelu Devi, Wife of Sri Umesh Prasad, Resident of village Linepar, Mirzapur, Police Station- Nawada, District- Nawada.

5. Kamta Paswan, son of Shri Bechu Paswan, Resident of Village- Kare, Police Station- Nawada, District- Nawada.

6. Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Late Bhagwat Pandey, Resident of Village- Neya, Police Station- Nawada Mufassil, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Nawada.

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada.

6. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Nawada. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra Jha-3, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. PARTHA SARTHI -GA4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 18986 of 2016 (Ravindra Kumar Verma & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved

Patna High Court CWJC No.7656 of 2018 dt.31-10-2018 in the present case.

In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of petitioners and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioners.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date1.11.2018 Transmission Date NA