Anil Prasad Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17952 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHKUND District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Anil Prasad Singh son of Late Naresh Prasad Singh

2. Bimla Devi wife of Anil Prasad Singh

3. Mukul Kumar @ Amaresh Kumar son of Anil Prasad Singh All are residents of Village - Chandpur, P.S. Sajour (Shahkund) District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajit Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2016 Heard Shri Pandey, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/307/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Diary in this case was called for earlier which has since been received.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the injury report, he will not press the case of the petitioner No. 1 So far as the petitioner No. 2 and 3 are concerned, they had no specific role to play and the privilege of anticipatory bail be granted to them.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17952 of 2016 (3) dt.01-07-2016 P2/2 Considering the entire facts and circumstances and the material which has surfaced in the case diary, let the petitioner No. 2, Bimla Devi and Petitioner No. 3 Mukul Kumar, in the event of their arrest / surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 116/2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

So far as the petitioner No. 1 is concerned, his case for anticipatory bail being not pressed, stands dismissed as infructuous.

However, if the petitioner No. 1 appears in the Court below and surrenders within a period of six weeks his case may be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T