← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/105/2018disposed

Kamlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-05Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.105 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10803 of 2011 ====================================================== Kamlesh Kumar, S/O Nagendra Sharma, R/O Vill.- Panchratna, P.S.- Ghorbanki, P.S. + Block- Basopatti, Distt.- Madhubani. .... .... ........... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, (Primary Education), Department of Human Resources, Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Madhubani, through its Chairman.

5. The Member, District Education Employment Appellate Authority, Madhubani.

6. The District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani.

7. The Block Development Officer, Block- Basopatti, Distt.- Madhubani.

8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block - Basopatti, Distt.- Madhubani.

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Ghorbanki, P.S. + Block- Basopatti, Distt.- Madhubani.

10. The Panchayat -Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Ghorbanki, P.S. + BlockBasopatti, Distt.- Madhubani.

11. Alok Kumar Jha, S/O Sri Narayan Jha, R/O Vill.- Ghorbanki, P.S.- Basopatti, Distt.- Madhubani.

.......Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pushpa Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Smt. Shilpa Singh, G.A. 12. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 11.10.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10803 of 2011 by which the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority,

Patna High Court MJC No.105 of 2018 (5) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 within a period of thirty days from the date of order i.e., 11.10.2017.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to mistake, he could not prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority. Hence, he prays for further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, the petitioner is granted further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority from today. The order dated 11.10.2017, passed in C. W. J. C. No. 10803 of 2011, stands modified to the extent as indicated above. The modification application is, accordingly, allowed. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U