Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30041/2017bail granted

Pradhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30041 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30041 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2015 Thana -ASARGANJ District- MUNGER ====================================================== Pradhan Yadav, Son of Anirudh Yadav, resident of Village- Chorgawan, P.S. Asarganj, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Asarganj P.S. Case No. 21 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, of the Indian Penal Code.

As per written report there is allegation against the petitioner that he fired two rounds but the same did not hit anybody. Besides this, there is no allegation of any specific overt act against the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Asarganj P.S. Case No. 21 of 2015, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30041 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T