Sunil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29181 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -189 Year- 2016 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Sunil Kumar Yadav son of Raghu Yadav, resident of Village- Koskapur, Police Station- Raniganj, District- Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raniganj P.S.Case No.189 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and it appears that his name transpired in the confession of the coaccused. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confession, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for about three months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that in the confession of the coaccused his name has transpired as well as a motorcycle has also
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29181 of 2017 (3) dt.24-07-2017 2/2 been recovered.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S.Case No.189 of 2016.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, otherwise, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(iv) If his active participation is found in such type of cases in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U