Uday Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63008 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2022 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Uday Chaudhari, Son Of Satendra Chaudhari, R/O Village- Lemboiya, P.S.- Roshanganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 427 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, four miscreants boarded on two motorcycles came and set the JCB vehicle on fire after sprinkling petrol. On being objected by Pintu Kumar, they started firing and fled away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63008 of 2022(2) dt.29-03-2023 2/2 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused Chhotu Chaudhari @ Dhananjay Chaudhari. The petitioner is accused in two other cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Roshanganj P.S. Case No. 100 of 2022.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T