Patna High CourtCWJC/10474/2017disposed

Suman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10474 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Suman Kumar Son of Late Kameshwar Lal Das, At+P.O. Rajani Babhangama, Police Station Bihariganj, District-Madhepura, Pin852101, at Present Suman Kumar, C/o Shree Parshuram Singh (Adv.) North Side of Dollor House Chowk, Sipahi Tola, Purnia, P.O.+Purnia, P.O.+DistrictPurnia, Pin 854301 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Education Department.

2. The District Education Officer, Purnea, District-Putnea.

3. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Purnea, DistrictPurnea.

4. The D.D.O.+2 Project Girl's High School, Dhamdaha, Purnea, H.M. J.L.N.S. Uchcha Madhyamik School, Gulabbag, P.O. + P.S. Gulabbag, District-Purnea.

5. The Incharge Head Master+ 2 Project Girl's High School, Dhamdaha, P.O.+Police Station-Dhamdaha, District-Purnea. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav- Gp23 Mr. Rajesh Kr. Sinha, A.C. to G.P.23.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-05-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is non-consideration of the case of the petitioner for financial up gradation under ACP and MACP scheme. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has now superannuated without getting the benefit of ACP and MACP scheme.

Considering the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed

Patna High Court CWJC No.10474 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2018 2/2 of with the direction to the respondents authorities to take final decision with regard to the claim of the petitioner and if the petitioner files representation along with copy of this order indicating his grievance within a period of one month from today along with copy of this order, the respondent No.3 is directed to take final decision on the claim of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order within 60 days of filing of such representation. With the aforesaid, this writ petition stand disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sanjeev/- U