Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65418/2023bail granted

Sudama Mahto @ Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-07Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65418 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2023 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== SUDAMA MAHTO @ AJIT KUMAR Son of Late Ram Surat Singh Resident of Village - Lakhan Tola, Present Mohalla - Bihiya Road Baba Mauil Ke Samne, P.S.- Piro, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 256 of 2023 dated 05.06.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 323,504, 307, 379 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have entered the house of the informant and assaulted on her head with an iron rod. Thereafter, the accused persons snatched ornaments and took Rs. 5000/- from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65418 of 2023(2) dt.07-11-2023 2/2 that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is tenant and the informant is land lord and there was some dispute between them regarding rent. Learned counsel has further submitted that the injury is only mentioned in medical report prescription of PHC, Piro Bhojpur which is not clear. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 256 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T