Rajev Karan @ Rajeev Karan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.367 of 2022 ====================================================== Rajev Karan @ Rajeev Karan Son of Basant Karan Resident of Village - Nonhi Garh, Police Station - Kako in the district of Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate - cum- Collector, Jehanabad. 5.

The District Program Officer, ICDS, Jehanabad. 6.

The Branch Manager, ICICI Bank, Jehanabad.

7.

The Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Jehanabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3 Mr. Arjun Prasad, A.C to S.C-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that he is confining his prayer in the writ petition to relief no. 2 which is in relation to a nationalized bank. The submission is that he has come to know about the freezing of his account no. 84540100000074 through a communication dated 17.11.2021 issued by the Branch Manager of the bank.

3. Perusal of letter itself reveals that the same has

Patna High Court CWJC No.367 of 2022(4) dt.05-10-2023 2/2 been frozen under order of the police in connection with Jehanabad P.S Case No. 136 of 2021.

4. Learned counsel submits that in the said case, the petitioner has been allowed anticipatory bail vide order dated 20.07.2021 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34230 of 2021.

5. On realizing the fact that the account has been frozen under order passed by the police, learned counsel submits that he would be availing the remedy against the order passed by the police authority in appropriate criminal jurisdiction, and in accordance with law.

6. With such liberty, writ application is disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Mayank/Sumit U