Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31613/2017dismissed

Ghodho Yadav @ Dhodho Yadav @Ghogho Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31613 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2017 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ====================================================== GHODHO YADAV @ DHODHO YADAV @GHOGHO YADAV Son of Degan Yadav, Resident of Village- Badhma, P.S. Laxamipur, DistrictJamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2017 This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2017 registered for the offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of throwing bomb causing injury to the informant and earlier case was lodged under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and other sections of the Indian Penal Code, but later on, as the informant died, section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has been added.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the FIR itself shows that though the petitioner had thrown the bomb, which not caused injury to any person.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31613 of 2017 (3) dt.01-08-2017 2/2 Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the informant and they oppose the prayer for bail, stating that the accused persons have exploded bomb which caused injury to the informant and the allegation against the petitioner is of throwing bomb.

Having heard both sides and in view of the allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Mahesh/- U T