Yogendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5344 of 2018 ====================================================== Yogendra Ray, aged about 76 years, Son of Late Mahavir Ray, Resident of Village- Muradpur, Police Station- Mahua, District- Vaishali a Social Activist and Senior Citizen for Welfare of Common Public in the Society. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Vaishali (Hajipur) North Bihar. 3.

The Sub Divisional Officer (S.D.O.), Mahua, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). 4.

The Circle Officer (C.O.), Mahua, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). 5.

The Superintendent of Police S.P., District- Vaishali (Hajipur). 6.

The Incharge, Police Station- Mahua (Hajipur), District- Vaishali. 7.

Harendra Thakur, Son of Late Baran Thakur, Resident of Village- Muradpur, Police Station- Mahua, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). 8.

Ranjit Singh, Son of Tileshwar Singh.

9.

Shyam Sundar Rai, Son of Ramprit Rai.

10.

Nageshwar Rai, Son of Ganesh Rai.

11.

Akhilesh Rai, Son of Bhullar Rai, All resident of Village- Moradpur, Post and Police Station- Mahua, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Anil Kr.Sinha, GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-09-2024 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner's grievance is with respect to the encroachment carried out by the Respondent Nos. 7 to 11, who are alleged to have forcefully encroached upon the part of land appertaining to Khata No. 98, Thana No. 299, Plot Nos. 173,

Patna High Court CWJC No.5344 of 2018(3) dt.13-09-2024 2/2 174 and 175 of Government Primary School, Muradpur, Vaishali.

3. A counter affidavit has been filed specifically stating that the encroachment has been removed by the encroachers themselves. The enquiry report of the Rajaswa Karmchari of Halka No. 5 of Anchal Mahua, C.O., Mahua is also produced as Annexure-R/7, based on which the encroachment proceedings were dropped as early as on 18.08.2016 which order is also produced as Annexure R/8.

4. We find absolutely no reason to keep the matter pending.

5. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Nani Tagia, J) Nilmani/AnushkaU