Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69796/2024bail granted

Vijay Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-03Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69796 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-640 Year-2002 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vijay Mahto S/O Brahmdeo Mahto @ Brahamdeo Mahto R/O- Vill- Desri Pakahi, P.S- Bibhutipur, Distt.- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 640 of 2002 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution arises out of a complaint case that too which has been registered after a delay.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner and others had got the husband of the complainant arrested and because of the same, the present false case has been filed. The petitioner is in jail since 03.05.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69796 of 2024(2) dt.03-10-2024 2/2 prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, after framing of charge if charge has not already been framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur/concerned Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 640 of 2002.

7. As a condition of this order, the petitioner, after being released on bail is directed to co-operate in the trial either by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the trial Court on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Noncompliance of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T