Rohit Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32894 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Rohit Singh, S/o Mahesh Singh, Resident of Village Bampali, P.S. Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Chandani Devi, D/o Shri Thun Singh, Resident of Village Dhamar, P.S. Muffasil Ara, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.Ii For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.32 of 2017 for the offences instituted under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32894 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

It has further been submitted on behalf of the parties that they are agreed to stay together. If the informant goes to the house of the petitioner, the petitioner shall keep his wife with all respect and dignity.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.32 of 2017 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Ara at Bhojpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T